Weekly Advocacy Monitor
WhAM!
Volume 6, Issue 28 August 4, 2008
1) What's Happening in the Nation's Capital?
Department of Justice Proposes Vast Changes in ADA Regulations
Healthcare, PAS, Assistive Technology Legislative Updates
Senators Running for Reelection by Region
Nine Charged in Disabled Teen's Death
Universal Design Summit III: Creating Livable Homes & Communities
Movie: Tropic Thunder - You Decide
1) What's Happening in the Nation's Capital?
Source: Politico
It's the first week of the August recess, which means Senators and Representatives are back in their districts, waiting to hear from you!
Rogue Session Part II: House Republicans had so much fun with their Friday afternoon theatrics in taking over the darkened House floor for a fake session on energy prices that they'll go for it again today. Politico raises the question, though, of whether the agitators have already lost some steam, as their leaders will not be around Monday. 'It's not a request we make lightly. But the American people are suffering,' GOP leaders Boehner and Blunt said in the memo asking their colleagues to return to Washington even though the Capitol is shut down.
Pelosi is still a firm 'no' on offshore drilling, as USA Today reports this morning, and that may help Obama [have it both ways]. Minority leader Boehner gets a bit misty eyed with his well-placed WSJ op-ed today: 'If House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) would allow a vote on our comprehensive energy plan -- a vote House Republicans and hundreds of Americans demanded on the House floor this past Friday, after Congress adjourned, in a historic revolt - we could create more American jobs, reduce America's energy dependence on nations with ties to global terrorism, cut emissions to promote a healthy environment, and raise our quality of life.'
Roll Call discovered that at least 11 former lobbyists are running for House seats - call it a Bizarro World revolving door: Despite criticism from their opponents, these lobbyists turned politicos argue: 'Many of the former lobbyists say their experience on the outside of the legislative process, whether at the state or federal level, would serve them well when it comes to maneuvering in the halls of Capitol Hill.'
Senators Tom Harkin and Orin Hatch Introduce the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (S 3406) with 56 Original Cosponsors!
Take Action: Urge Your Senator to Support and Pass S 3406!
Thursday, July 31st, Senator Harkin (D-IA) assured advocates on a national call that the Senate Bill 3406 builds on the House-passed ADA Amendments Act (which passed the House overwhelmingly in June by a 402-17 vote) in a way that maximizes bipartisan consensus. NCIL strongly supports S 3406 and urges disability advocates to call their two Senators and schedule meetings to urge them to cosponsor and support S 3406. If your Senator is already a cosponsor, thank him or her for doing the right thing!
If your Senator is not a cosponsor, please try to visit him or her during the August recess, when Senators are in your area. You can check your Senator's schedule of town hall meetings and call their office to set up a meeting by visiting the senate web site: http://www.senate.gov and visiting your Senators' web pages.
Original co-sponsors Include:
Tom Harkin (D-IA), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Edward Kennedy (D-MA), Michael Enzi (R-WY), Arlen Specter (R-PA), Barack Obama (D-IL), John McCain (R-AZ), Chris Dodd (D-CT), Judd Gregg (R-NH), Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Pat Roberts (R-KS), John Kerry (D-MA), Norm Coleman (R-MN), Russell Feingold (D-WI), Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
Richard Burr (R-NC), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Gordon Smith (R-OR), Richard Durbin (D-IL), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), John Warner (R-VA), Bernard Sanders (I-VT), Sam Brownback (R-KS), Jack Reed (D-RI), Mel Martinez (R-FL), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Johnny Isakson (R-GA), Robert Casey (D-PA), Larry Craig (R-ID), Patty Murray (D-WA), Robert Bennett (R-UT), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Susan Collins (R-ME), Joe Biden (D-DE), Wayne Allard (R-CO), Nelson, John Sununu (R-NH), Benjamin Cardin (D-MD), John Thune (D-SD), Carl Levin (D-MI), John Barrasso (R-WY), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Ted Stevens (R-AK), Ken Salazar (D-CO), George Voinovich (R-OH), John Tester (D-MT), Thad Cochran (R-MS), Harry Reid (D-NV), Richard Lugar (R-IN), Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
Let NCIL know what your lawmakers and their staff say. Please contact NCIL Policy Analyst Deb Cotter by email deb@ncil.org with "S.3406 Senate Follow up" in the subject line or by phone (202) 207-0334, ext. 1008. Thank you!
Department of Justice Proposes Vast Changes in ADA Regulations
From the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF)
Your Comments Urgently Needed! Please forward this alert widely. The deadline for comments is August 18, 2008. To see draft comments, visit www.dredf.org/DOJ_NPRM
The Department of Justice recently issued major proposed revisions to its regulations implementing Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Some of DOJ's changes are excellent, and urgently needed. It is important that the disability community laud these, to support DOJ against industry attack. Good proposals include adoption of the new 2004 ADAAG, stronger hotel reservation and ticketing provisions, recognition of psychiatric service animals, additional companion seating in theaters and stadiums, and stronger provisions for effective communication for people with hearing, visual, and speech disabilities.
However, there are also many draconian changes that would radically reduce the rights of people with disabilities. For example, DOJ proposes:
- A significant weakening of the readily achievable barrier removal requirement for public
accommodations;
- A significant reduction of elements required to be accessible in state and local government
facilities;
- An exemption for all existing facilities from the new recreation and playground rules;
- and many others.
DOJ must receive a flood of comments from the disability community in favor of a strong, comprehensive ADA. Comments must defend the principle of individual, case-by-case assessment, which DOJ is largely abandoning in favor of many blanket reductions. We must remind DOJ that the ADA is already carefully crafted to take the needs of covered entities into account, and that reductions to our civil rights would be a devastating blow to our daily lives.
Extensive draft comments, by topic, are available on the DREDF website to help you write your own comments -- click here. The list of topics is also below. The website also has information about how to file your comments, as well as tips on commenting and a link to the proposed regulations.
Important: Your comments will have the most impact if you revise our drafts to add your own thoughts, and especially your own personal experiences or those of friends, family, colleagues or clients with disabilities.
Make Your Voice Heard: Send Your Comments! Topics in the DOJ Proposals Are:
- Safe Harbor
§ One-percent (1%) safe harbor for barrier removal in existing facilities for qualified small businesses
§ "Reasonable number but at least one" in program access under Title II
§ Exemption for facilities that allegedly comply with the 1991 ADAAG
§ Path of travel
- Definition of "existing facility"
- Comments on the Regulatory Impact Analysis
- Title II Complaint Process
- Communications; auxiliary aids and services
- Service animals
- Hotel reservations policies
- Seating and ticketing in assembly areas
- Medical care facilities
- Wheelchairs and other power-driven mobility devices
- Prisons, jails and the Prison Litigation Reform Act
- Social service agencies, residential facilities, transient lodging, and dormitories
- Recreation Facilities and Play Areas
§ Recreation facilities and Play areas (General Comments)
§ Saunas and steam rooms
§ Swimming pools
§ Exercise equipment
§ Team player and seating areas
§ Areas of sport activity
§ Boating and fishing
§ Golf
§ Miniature Golf
§ Topics not addressed
- Questions concerning specific 2004 ADAAG Standards
§ General comments
§ Side reach
§ Water closet clearances in single-user toilet rooms with in-swinging doors
§ Elevators
§ Stairs
§ Accessible routes to stages
§ Accessible attorney areas and witness stands
§ Assistive listening system
§ Accessible routes to golf tees and greens
§ Work Areas
§ Maintenance of accessible features
§ ATMs
§ Examinations and courses
§ Triggering Date
Healthcare, PAS, Assistive Technology Legislative Updates
Congress is on Recess for the next three weeks. The Healthcare, PAS and Assistive Technology Sub/Committees urge you to get involved in your local politics. Legislators listen to their constituents! Time For Change: Use Your Power! Invite your Representative or Senator to events at your CIL. The Capitol switchboard will get you to every member of congress 1-202-224-3121. Pick up the phone today and find out where your federal representatives are campaigning. See the article on who's getting re-elected and who's retiring (below). Tell your elected officials your personal stories and ask for their support on the following bills. If you have questions or need more information, please contact Elizabeth Leef at elizabeth@ncil.org or call 202-207-0334.
The Healthcare Committee is working on passage of the following bills.
Promoting Wellness for People with Disabilities Act, HR 3294 and S 1050
NCIL applauds Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) and Representative Nita Lowey (D-NY) for introducing the Promoting Wellness for People with Disabilities Act of 2007. Health and wellness are important to all individuals, especially people with disabilities. Accessible medical examination equipment is crucial and access to healthcare must be unbiased. This legislation is the first to address the need for establishing accessibility standards for medical diagnostic equipment, such as examination tables, examination chairs, weight scales, mammography equipment, X-ray machines, and other equipment commonly used for diagnostic purposes by medical professionals. HR 3294 and S 1050 require medical and dental schools, along with their residency programs, to increase training to improve competency and clinical skills in providing care to patients with disabilities, including those with intellectual disabilities. Currently, few medical schools provide education for their students in treating people with disabilities and providing accommodations to ensure access to quality care. The Promoting Wellness for People with Disabilities Act also creates a small grant program to prevent secondary conditions and promote healthy lifestyles for people with disabilities. The Senate bill is currently in the Health, Education, Labor and
Pension Committee and the House version has been referred to the Committee on Education and Labor's Subcommittee on Health, Education, Labor and Pension.
Medicare Independent Living Act, HR 1809 and S 2103
The Independent Living Act of 2007 will eliminate an incorrect and devastating interpretation of the "In-Home Rule" by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare's mobility device benefit has never been generous. In fact, Medicare will only provide wheelchairs and scooters to those beneficiaries who need them to eat, bathe, groom, dress, or use the bathroom inside their
home. In many communities, CMS takes a hard line on the issue and insists that if the provided medical device is used outside the home, the recipient is no longer entitled to the device. The current rule prevents beneficiaries from living independently by returning to work or school, regaining self-sufficiency, accessing their place of worship, the voting booth, and the homes of family and friends. Medicare continues to pursue such myopic and irrational policies that genuinely harm beneficiaries in the name of reducing fraud and abuse. NCIL denounces CMS for its continued refusal to address Medicare's restrictive "In-Home Rule" policy, which was originally meant to define durable medical equipment as devices provided outside an institution, hospital, or nursing home which therefore warranted separate reimbursement under Medicare Part B. Instead, it is interpreted by CMS to restrict coverage only to mobility devices that are used exclusively within the beneficiary's home. NCIL commends Representative James Langevin (D-RI) and Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) for introducing this needed legislative fix. The House bill is currently in the Ways and Means Committee's Subcommittee on Health and its Senate counterpart has been referred to the Committee on Finance.
Ending the Medicare Waiting Period Act, HR 154 and S 2102
NCIL supports elimination of the 24-month Medicare waiting period. If a person qualifies for Social Security Disability Insurance, they are by definition disabled and usually in need of medical attention. This bill will immediately eliminate the two year waiting period for those that need immediate, lifesaving medical attention. For those without a life-threatening condition, the waiting period will be eliminated within 10 years of enactment. Currently, there are about 600,000 Americans with significant disabilities who have no insurance and go without healthcare. Many go into debt, are forced into personal bankruptcy, or die while waiting the required two years for their Medicare coverage to begin after they are deemed eligible for Social Security Disability. Twelve percent of people in the Medicare waiting period die each year while waiting for coverage to begin. This practice must stop. Death and illness do not wait on bureaucracy. NCIL commends Representative Gene Green (D-TX) and Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) for introducing the Ending the Medicare Waiting Period Act of 2007. The House bill is currently in the Ways and Means Committee's Subcommittee on Health and the Senate version has been referred to the Finance Committee.
The PAS Committee is working on passage of the following bills:
Community Choice Act, HR 1621 and S 799
NCIL strongly endorses the Community Choice Act of 2007 because it will help bring an end to the shameful institutional bias in this country. Currently, every state that receives Medicaid is required by law to provide nursing facility services, but community-based services remain optional, leaving them open to funding cuts year after year as institutions remain prosperous. As a direct result, millions of seniors and people with disabilities are forced into institutions to receive medical or personal assistance services. The Community Choice Act requires states to offer community-based supports for Medicaid-eligible consumers who want to stay in or return to their homes and communities. It will provide a real alternative to institutional care that many states lack, as well as saving Medicaid billions of dollars.
CLASS Act: Community Living Assistance Services and Supports, HR 3001 and S 1758
The CLASS Act would assist people with disabilities who are employed and in need of long term assistance or supports by providing a flexible cash insurance benefit that could be used creatively to purchase services, supports and technology. NCIL applauds the creative approach of the bill in addressing issues around long term care services. We believe an insurance program that is affordable, available nationwide, and not tied to poverty and unemployment is a laudable goal and a much-needed piece of the long term service puzzle. Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and Representative Frank Pallone (D-NJ) introduced the CLASS Act. The Senate Bill has been referred to the Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) Committee and the House bill has been referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Committee on Rules.
The Assistive Technology Committee is working on passage of the following bills:
The 21st Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2008, HR 6320
This bill has been introduced in the House and currently has 4 sponsors. A Senate companion bill is expected to be introduced shortly. Click here to view the text of this bill (PDF).
Senators Running for Reelection by Region
In 2009 many Senators will be running for reelection or retiring. If your Senator is running for re-election, talk to them about issues important to your community & state. If you have any questions, contact Deb Cotter or Elizabeth Leef. NCIL's Policy Analysts are here to serve you! Note:*=retiring
Region 1: John Kerry (D-MA), Jack Reed (D-RI), Susan Collins (R-ME), John Sununu (R-NH)
Region 2: Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Region 3: Joseph Biden (D-DE), John Rockefeller (D-WV), *John Warner(R-VA), Mark Warner (D-VA), Jim Gilmore(R-VA)
Region 4: Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Thad Cochran (R-MS), Elizabeth Dole (R- NC), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Region 5: Richard Durbin (D-IL), Carl Levin (D-MI), Norm Coleman (R- MN)
Region 6: Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Mark Pryor (D-AR), John Cornyn (R-TX), *Pete Domenici (R-NM), James Inhofe (R-OK)
Region 7: Tom Harkin (D-IA), *Chuck Hagel (R- NE), Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Region 8: Max Baucus (D-MT), Tim Johnson (D-SD), *Wayne Allard (R-CO), Michael Enzi (R-WY)
Region 9: None
Region 10: *Larry Craig (R-ID), Gordon Smith (R-OR), Ted Stevens (R-AK)
3) State News
Nine Charged in Disabled Teen's Death
Source: AP, by Kathy Matheson
Philadelphia - For days before Danieal Kelly died in a fetid, airless room - made stifling hot by a midsummer heat wave - the bedridden teenager begged for something to drink until she could muster only one word: water. Unable to help herself because of her cerebral palsy, she wasted away from malnutrition and maggot-infested bedsores that ate her flesh. She died alone on a putrid mattress in her mother's home, the floor covered in feces. She was 14 but weighed just 42 pounds.
The nightmare of forced starvation and infection that killed Danieal while she was under the protection of the city's human services agency is documented in a 258-page grand jury report released this week that charges nine people - her parents, four social workers and three family friends - in her ghastly death.
The report describes a mother, Andrea Kelly, who was embarrassed by her disabled daughter and didn't want to touch her, take her out in public, change her diapers or make sure she had enough fluids. It portrays Daniel Kelly, the father who once had custody of Danieal, as having no interest in raising her. And it accuses the city Department of Human Services of being "uncaring and incompetent."
"It was this indifference that helped kill Danieal Kelly," an angry District Attorney Lynne Abraham said. "How is it possible for this to have happened?" The report should "outrage the entire Philadelphia community" and bring about "earth-shattering, cataclysmic changes" at the Department of Human Services, Abraham said.
Andrea Kelly, 39, the only defendant charged with murder, was ordered held Friday without bail. The social workers - suspected of falsifying home visits and progress reports in the case - face charges ranging from child endangerment to involuntary manslaughter. The family friends are accused of lying to the grand jury about the girl's condition before her death. None of the lawyers for any of the defendants had any immediate comment. Read article in full.
4) Announcements
Universal Design Summit III: Creating Livable Homes & Communities
Sept. 21-23, 2008, St Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
UNIVERSAL DESIGN SUMMIT III continues its tradition of providing outstanding content in universal design features in housing, sustainability, community design, green design and affordability with a focus on homes and communities for EVERYONE! Universal Design (UD) is transparent, inclusive, attractive; integrates features that improve function and usability for everyone; is a better approach to design and construction. It can be achieved in all house sizes and price points. Vendors, plenaries, breakout sessions, design charrettes and site visits await you!
Who Should Sign Up? Architects, interior designers, for-profit and non profit builders and developers, contractors/remodelers, planners, housing finance agencies, building owners/managers, policy makers, rehabilitation engineers, students and faculty, health care professionals, local, county and state agency staff, Independent Living Centers, Area Agencies on Aging, and cooperative extension. CEU's available! Registration Open now! Sponsored by: AARP, St. Louis Affordable Housing Commission, Interdisciplinary Center for Aging (Missouri University), Missouri Housing Development Commission, St. Louis County Office for Community Development; AIA St. Louis, St. Louis University, Trivers & Associates, Washington University: Center for Aging; College & Graduate School of Architecture, Missouri Commission on Human Rights, Washington University in Saint Louis.
Organized by: Starkloff Disability Institute, Missouri Statewide Independent Living Council (SILC), and Housing Works, Inc. (NC). For more information: udsummit@starkloff.org or 314-588-7090.
5) Additional Resources
Versus: "Disability and Prejudice: A Case for Extended Protections" vs. "Redefining Disability?" by Human Resource Executive
Recent disability news coverage has focused lately on "expanded" protections for people with disabilities, eliciting both positive support for the momentum of our movement and the familiar negative rhetoric of those who refuse to believe that the sky is safe and sound. In this week's feature, Versus, explore the issues confronting America and prepare your case!
Disability and Prejudice: A Case for Extended Protections
Source: JURIST, by Guest Columnist Michael Waterstone of Loyola Law School Los Angeles, who says that recent prejudiced comments about autistic and other disabled persons by American talk radio host Michael Savage reflect too-common misunderstandings of disability that warrant Congressional extension of existing legal protections against discrimination...
On his nationally-syndicated radio talk show, Michael Savage recently referred to children with autism as "frauds and brats," explained that the high levels of asthma impacting minority children were because "the children got extra welfare if they were disabled," and has ridiculed people with physical and mental disabilities on his show. This has ignited a firestorm as to whether various radio stations should drop Savage. Especially with large numbers of veterans with service-connected disabilities returning home, the public has shown decreased patience for this type of hate-mongering, making it likely Savage will go the way of Don Imus in a lot of markets.
But Savage's comments demonstrate a point that is more important than the issue of whether he should be fired or not. As the 18th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act approaches, Savage's prejudiced comments show why the statute was originally enacted and why recent Congressional action to amend the statute to make it stronger is needed.
Savage's fairly unimaginative comments represent one snapshot of how people with disabilities have been viewed in this country: as fakers. Other stereotypes include being labeled objects of pity, unproductive drags on society, and even being cursed by some divine power. Congress recognized the collective power of these views when it passed the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act. Explicitly finding that people with disabilities had been marginalized and discriminated against, Congress forcefully stated that people with disabilities should have civil rights commensurate with other citizens. Employers were no longer allowed to refuse to hire people with disabilities because they didn't like or feel comfortable with them. Both public programs and privately owned places that are open to the public had to take steps to become more accessible.
Over time, this law has changed hearts and minds. People are becoming more accustomed to seeing people with disabilities in public spaces or in the employment arena. As always happens, stereotypes and prejudice recede and awareness is raised. We have become a more inclusive society, and our laws have become a model for the world.
But not everything has changed. Although not always expressed in as blatant terms as Michael Savage, whether as a function of outright dislike or more subtle animus, people with disabilities are still too often judged on the basis of their disability instead of their true abilities. Without asking, employers feel that an employee who is blind "simply won't be able to do the job," or a restaurant owner does not feel the need to put down a ramp because "no one with a wheelchair has ever dined here." Judges, too often viewing people with disabilities through a pitying or paternalistic lens, have interpreted the statute in extremely limited ways. Based on unstated fears of letting the law get out of control (perhaps, in Savage's parlance, letting fakers get extra benefits), recent cases have held that people with mental retardation and cancer are not really disabled. Lawmakers and judges have even speculated that under current interpretations, someone with a prosthetic limb might not be considered disabled. This belies Congressional intent and common sense.
This is why Congress is poised to pass a new law clarifying that the Americans with Disabilities Act should be interpreted broadly to provide more individuals with greater protections. Representatives of both the business and disability rights communities have worked hard to find common ground, and this law's prospects for passage are good. Comments like Michael Savage's remind us that prejudice against people with physical and mental disabilities still exists, and, like with race and sex discrimination, we still need the government's help in creating a more just society.
Redefining Disability?
Article by Human Resource Executives Online, by Mark McGraw
A recent ruling that declared an individual with impaired sexual ability to be disabled may lead many human resource executives to rethink their approach to disability claims, experts say.
A recent court ruling found that the loss of sexual desire is a disability requiring reasonable accommodation could lead to increased lawsuits. In the case of
Kathy E. Adams vs. Condoleezza Rice, Adams, a U.S. Foreign Service candidate and breast-cancer survivor, sued the State Department, which had revoked her
medical clearance and denied her candidacy for a foreign posting after she was diagnosed with breast cancer, even though she had been cancer-free after
undergoing surgical treatment.
Adams also underwent a mastectomy and had her ovaries and fallopian tubes removed. As a result of her treatment, she gained weight and reported feeling her libido decline, according to court documents. In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently ruled that Adams's lawsuit against the State Department may proceed, concluding that sex is the kind of "major life activity" that Congress considered when it passed the Rehabilitation Act in 1973.
The decision gives Adams a second chance to potentially serve overseas, and may have opened the floodgates for more disability claims, says Victoria Zellers, a member of the labor and employment practice group in the Philadelphia office of law firm Cozen O'Connor.
"The Adams ruling is likely to trigger more disability claims," she says, "because there are numerous physical and mental impairments which limit one's ability to engage in sexual relations." Moreover, the Adams decision may be a sign that more disability claims will survive summary judgment and go to trial, Zellers adds. "Proving one is disabled is often a high legal hurdle that a plaintiff cannot meet to allow his or her case to proceed to trial.
"Many impairments do not substantially limit the 'major life activities' specifically enumerated in the Department of Labor's regulations, i.e., seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, speaking, learning, working, performing manual tasks or caring for oneself," Zellers continues. "Under the Adams decision, impairments such as a heart condition or depression -- which physically or mentally limits one's ability to engage in sexual relations -- will qualify as disabilities."
She says HR professionals "will have to view the term disability much more broadly than before." "In addition to the fact that more persons will qualify as disabled -- with sexual relations qualifying as a major life activity -- an employer will not even have to know about the employee's specific limitations before it will be charged with knowledge of a disability for discrimination claims," she says.
Decisions regarding what constitutes a disability and the meaning of "major life activity" have been "all over the map" since the Americans with Disabilities Act was passed more than 15 years ago, says Mark Spring, partner in the Sacramento office of employment law firm Carlton, DiSante & Freudenberger.
Much like the ADA is designed to protect the at-large workforce, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is intended to prohibit discrimination against federal employees and covers a wide range of mental and physical impairments that significantly limit a major life activity.
Although the Adams case is not binding on lawsuits filed under the ADA, the ruling will almost certainly come up as such cases are brought to court.
How disability is defined also varies from state to state. In California, for example, the definition of disability under the state's Fair Employment and Housing Act is much broader than the current ADA definition, Spring says. As such, employees in California who may not be considered disabled under the ADA or Rehabilitation Act would be considered disabled under FEHA, and would be entitled to reasonable accommodation and protection from discrimination. This particular decision may ultimately affect how companies approach the evaluation of disability claims, says Spring.
"The lesson of Adams vs. Rice is that employers must remember that the ADA does not just protect disabled employees, but it also protects employees who are regarded as being disabled and who have a record of having a disability," Spring says. Employers must make sure they understand how broad the ADA is when making employment decisions, he says. HR is integral in making sure the message is clearly communicated throughout the organization, and can lend a very helpful hand in these instances.
"It often falls on HR professionals to educate and train managers and supervisors in this area, to minimize the risks of making a mistake," says Spring. "In addition, HR must try to make sure they are consulted on the difficult decisions, so that their expertise is not being wasted, resulting in subsequent litigation. This is an area where knowledgeable HR professionals can save their employers money and headaches."
Movie: Tropic Thunder - You Decide
From the New York Times: Whether Mr. Stiller's movie-within-a-movie subplot about his character's would-be Oscar turn as the developmentally handicapped title character of "Simple Jack" incites a backlash remains to be seen. A mock promotional Web site for "Simple Jack," simplejackmovie.com - which features Mr. Stiller cavorting as a bucktoothed, kindhearted dolt - has drawn a wary response from some.
On Friday the Web site Patriciaebauer.com, which compiles news and commentary related to disability issues, highlighted a "Simple Jack" promotional image that carries the slogan "Once Upon a Time There Was a Retard." In an accompanying post, Patricia E. Bauer, the veteran journalist who runs the site, invited debate over the film's approach, and especially its use of what many call "the R-word."
Reached in Vancouver, British Columbia, where he has been working on "Night at the Museum 2: Battle of the Smithsonian," Mr. Stiller suggested that the movie would speak for itself. "It's hard for me to tell people how to react," he said. "The whole point of the movie is about actors, and the length actors will go to to advance their careers." Read article in full.




